Offer from Durness Estate / 01 January 2003

 

1 January 2003

 

Ian Wilson

Leewood

Leewood Road

Dunblane

Perthshire FK15 0DR

 

Telephone:      01786 822161

Fax:                01786 823733

 

For the attention of Eddie Meyer, Chairman of Laid, Polla and Portnacon Residents’ Association for discussion with Residents’ Association

 

At the last meeting of the Residents’ Association Sergio Blanco made it clear that Association members were not happy that the Laid Community Group should take over control of Laid. The meeting also felt that because Laid had been highlighted as the Flagship area for the Scottish Executive’s Land Reform Legislation that pressure would be bought to bear on members of the Residents Association to support the aims of the Laid Community Group. Following on the last meeting further discussions initiated by Eddie Meyer and Alfred Walker have taken place. They made it clear that members of the Residents Association did not want a divisive Laid Community in which a vote had been taken which resulted in the Laid Community Group gaining control. Eddie Meyer and Alfred Walker felt that the majority of people in Laid were not necessarily opposed to a Community buy-out but were opposed to a buy-out through the Laid Community Group. They asked that I discuss with them alternatives which would achieve the aims of the Residents Association and avoid a public vote which would be divisive. These discussions have taken place and what Eddie Meyer and Alfred Walker believe the Residents might find to be the basis of an acceptable solution is as follows.

 

A new community body would be set up in which members of the Laid, Polla and Portnacon Residents Association controlled 51% and also elected a majority of the Directors. The estate would have 49% and a minority of the Directors.

 

The Estate would cover the costs of setting up the new Community body and transfer the land into the new community body at no cost to the Community.

 

 

 

 

The new Community body in order to maintain good relations with the Durness Common Grazings would indicate that they had no wish to acquire the Port Chamuill Area. Rather they would seek agreement with the Durness Common Grazings and the Rispond Estate to have a formal access agreement to use the facilities at Port Chamuill by the Laid residents.

 

The Estate would retain control of the minerals but would enter into a legal agreement that would pay royalties to a Durness Community body should the minerals be worked. The Laid Community body would receive as a right a fixed percentage of these royalties.

 

I was asked to sound out my colleagues and report back. This is confirmation that we would support the proposal as put forward. We would ask that the Residents Association be canvassed so that meaningful discussion can take place at the meeting next Sunday.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Signed Ian Wison on original letter.